[2 As a matter of fact several nonUnix operating systems such as Windows NT are POSIXcompliant
To define a common user interface, Unix-like kernels often share fundamental design ideas and features. In this respect, Linux is comparable with the other Unix-like operating systems. Reading this book and studying the Linux kernel, therefore, may help you understand the other Unix variants too.
The 2.4 version of the Linux kernel aims to be compliant with the IEEE POSIX standard. This, of course, means that most existing Unix programs can be compiled and executed on a Linux system with very little effort or even without the need for patches to the source code. Moreover, Linux includes all the features of a modern Unix operating system, such as virtual memory, a virtual filesystem, lightweight processes, reliable signals, SVR4 interprocess communications, support for Symmetric Multiprocessor (SMP) systems, and so on.
By itself, the Linux kernel is not very innovative. When Linus Torvalds wrote the first kernel, he referred to some classical books on Unix internals, like Maurice Bach's The Design of the Unix Operating System (Prentice Hall, 1986). Actually, Linux still has some bias toward the Unix baseline described in Bach's book (i.e., SVR4). However, Linux doesn't stick to any particular variant. Instead, it tries to adopt the best features and design choices of several different Unix kernels.
The following list describes how Linux competes against some well-known commercial Unix kernels:
It is a large, complex do-it-yourself program, composed of several logically different components. In this, it is quite conventional; most commercial Unix variants are monolithic. (A notable exception is Carnegie-Mellon's Mach 3.0, which follows a microkernel approach.)
Compiled and statically linked traditional Unix kernels
Most modern kernels can dynamically load and unload some portions of the kernel code (typically, device drivers), which are usually called modules. Linux's support for modules is very good, since it is able to automatically load and unload modules on demand. Among the main commercial Unix variants, only the SVR4.2 and Solaris kernels have a similar feature.
Some modern Unix kernels, such as Solaris 2.x and SVR4.2/MP, are organized as a set of kernel threads. A kernel thread is an execution context that can be independently scheduled; it may be associated with a user program, or it may run only some kernel functions. Context switches between kernel threads are usually much less expensive than context switches between ordinary processes, since the former usually operate on a common address space. Linux uses kernel threads in a very limited way to execute a few kernel functions periodically; since Linux kernel threads cannot execute user programs, they do not represent the basic execution context abstraction. (That's the topic of the next item.)
Multithreaded application support
Most modern operating systems have some kind of support for multithreaded applications — that is, user programs that are well designed in terms of many relatively independent execution flows that share a large portion of the application data structures. A multithreaded user application could be composed of many lightweight processes (LWP), which are processes that can operate on a common address space, common physical memory pages, common opened files, and so on. Linux defines its own version of lightweight processes, which is different from the types used on other systems such as SVR4 and Solaris. While all the commercial Unix variants of LWP are based on kernel threads, Linux regards lightweight processes as the basic execution context and handles them via the nonstandard clone( ) system call.
Linux 2.4 cannot arbitrarily interleave execution flows while they are in privileged mode. 13! Several sections of kernel code assume they can run and modify data structures without fear of being interrupted and having another thread alter those data structures. Usually, fully preemptive kernels are associated with special realtime operating systems. Currently, among conventional, general-purpose Unix systems, only Solaris 2.x and Mach 3.0 are fully preemptive kernels. SVR4.2/MP introduces some fixed preemption points as a method to get limited preemption capability.
 This restriction has been removed in the Linux 2.5 development version.
Several Unix kernel variants take advantage of multiprocessor systems. Linux 2.4 supports symmetric multiprocessing (SMP): the system can use multiple processors and each processor can handle any task — there is no discrimination among them. Although a few parts of the kernel code are still serialized by means of a single "big kernel lock," it is fair to say that Linux 2.4 makes a near optimal use of SMP.
Linux's standard filesystems come in many flavors, You can use the plain old Ext2 filesystem if you don't have specific needs. You might switch to Ext3 if you want to avoid lengthy filesystem checks after a system crash. If you'll have to deal with many small files, the ReiserFS filesystem is likely to be the best choice. Besides Ext3 and ReiserFS, several other journaling filesystems can be used in Linux, even if they are not included in the vanilla Linux tree; they include IBM AlX's Journaling File System (JFS) and Silicon Graphics Irix's XFS filesystem. Thanks to a powerful object-oriented Virtual File System technology (inspired by Solaris and SVR4), porting a foreign filesystem to Linux is a relatively easy task.
Linux has no analog to the STREAMS I/O subsystem introduced in SVR4, although it is included now in most Unix kernels and has become the preferred interface for writing device drivers, terminal drivers, and network protocols.
This somewhat modest assessment does not depict, however, the whole truth. Several features make Linux a wonderfully unique operating system. Commercial Unix kernels often introduce new features to gain a larger slice of the market, but these features are not necessarily useful, stable, or productive. As a matter of fact, modern Unix kernels tend to be quite bloated. By contrast, Linux doesn't suffer from the restrictions and the conditioning imposed by the market, hence it can freely evolve according to the ideas of its designers (mainly Linus Torvalds). Specifically, Linux offers the following advantages over its commercial competitors:
• Linux is free. You can install a complete Unix system at no expense other than the hardware (of course).
• Linux is fully customizable in all its components. Thanks to the General Public License (GPL), you are allowed to freely read and modify the source code of the kernel and of all system programs. 14]
 Several commercial companies have started to support their products under Linux. However, most of them aren't distributed under an open source license, so you might not be allowed to read or modify their source code.
• Linux runs on low-end, cheap hardware platforms. You can even build a network server using an old Intel 80386 system with 4 MB of RAM.
• Linux is powerful. Linux systems are very fast, since they fully exploit the features of the hardware components. The main Linux goal is efficiency, and indeed many design choices of commercial variants, like the STREAMS I/O subsystem, have been rejected by Linus because of their implied performance penalty.
• Linux has a high standard for source code quality. Linux systems are usually very stable; they have a very low failure rate and system maintenance time.
• The Linux kernel can be very small and compact. It is possible to fit both a kernel image and full root filesystem, including all fundamental system programs, on just one 1.4 MB floppy disk. As far as we know, none of the commercial Unix variants is able to boot from a single floppy disk.
• Linux is highly compatible with many common operating systems. It lets you directly mount filesystems for all versions of MS-DOS and MS Windows, SVR4, OS/2, Mac OS, Solaris, SunOS, NeXTSTEP, many BSD variants, and so on. Linux is also able to operate with many network layers, such as Ethernet (as well as Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet), Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), High Performance Parallel Interface (HIPPI), IBM's Token Ring, AT&T WaveLAN, and DEC RoamAbout DS. By using suitable libraries, Linux systems are even able to directly run programs written for other operating systems. For example, Linux is able to execute applications written for MS-DOS, MS Windows, SVR3 and R4, 4.4BSD, SCO Unix, XENIX, and others on the 80 x 86 platform.
• Linux is well supported. Believe it or not, it may be a lot easier to get patches and updates for Linux than for any other proprietary operating system. The answer to a problem often comes back within a few hours after sending a message to some newsgroup or mailing list. Moreover, drivers for Linux are usually available a few weeks after new hardware products have been introduced on the market. By contrast, hardware manufacturers release device drivers for only a few commercial operating systems — usually Microsoft's. Therefore, all commercial Unix variants run on a restricted subset of hardware components.
With an estimated installed base of several tens of millions, people who are used to certain features that are standard under other operating systems are starting to expect the same from Linux. In that regard, the demand on Linux developers is also increasing. Luckily, though, Linux has evolved under the close direction of Linus to accommodate the needs of the masses.
Continue reading here: Hardware Dependency
Was this article helpful?